MIS C1 vs MIS V3
Side-by-side comparison in plain English
The MIS C1 (mid-range) and the MIS V3 (mid-range) share the same connection, material, implant type.
| Specification | MIS C1 | MIS V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | MIS | MIS |
| Manufacturer | Dentsply Sirona | Dentsply Sirona |
| Made in | 🇮🇱 Israel | 🇮🇱 Israel |
| Price level | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Implant type | Bone-level implants | Bone-level implants |
| Connection | Conical (Morse-taper) connection | Conical (Morse-taper) connection |
| Material | Titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V (Grade 5 / 23) | Titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V (Grade 5 / 23) |
| Surface | MIS sand-blasted & acid-etched | MIS sand-blasted & acid-etched |
| Diameters | 3.3 – 5.0 mm | 3.3 – 5.0 mm |
| Lengths | 6 – 16 mm | 8 – 16 mm |
| Body shape | Tapered | Tapered, triangular neck |
| Platform switching | Yes | Yes |
| In plain English | Conical connection with a 6-position index. | Its triangular neck leaves gaps that fill with bone, aiming to keep more bone around the neck. |
Highlighted rows are where the two implants differ.
Which is better for me?
Both are established systems. The right choice depends on your bone, the position of the tooth, your budget, and above all your dentist's experience with the system. Ask your dentist why they recommend one over the other.
Add a third implant to this comparison
Specifications are typical catalogue values. Confirm details with the manufacturer or your dentist.